Abstract:
"Feminist critiques of scientific culture have expanded the discourse around scientific history, practice and theory since the 1960s, while offering new possibilities for artistic investigation. Discussions include how male-gendered language has dominated descriptions of biological and other scientific processes, and whether there are sexual differences in approaches to the study of living organisms and systems.
The ways in which contemporary female artists employ digital and electronic technology to explore scientific themes and issues is fascinating to me. I'm intrigued by their uses of interactivity and humor, their interpretations of “relational aesthetics,” and their morphing of traditional feminist concerns into often subtle yet powerful critiques of patriarchal structures, gender politics, and established assumptions in technology and science. I'm particularly intrigued by their approaches to the biological sciences."
Tanner asserted that these strategies served to morph feminist strategies by countering the historical narrative of Science as objective and free from cultural bias and by co-opting and re-interpreting male-created technologies.I felt like her whole abstract asserted a lot of things that were not thoroughly substantiated in her talk, rather that she showed us a lot of artists without much theory or justification.
Regardless it was interesting, as she presented the work of a lot of artists. She started with Martha Maxwell, in particular her taxidermy exhibit for the Philadelphia Centennial Exhibition in 1876:
She showed the macro-video art of Catherine Chalmers; the robotics/hacking art of France Cadet, specifically Hunting Trophies; Sabrina Raaf's robot Grower that draws "grass" in response to CO2 levels in a room. Her Unstoppable Hum project also seems cool.
Deborah Aschheim makes incredible neural network-art. She is an anthropologist and neuroscientist, and makes things like this:
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj5qAYL_q9JU4jDWM3-LuHhzJZQ3UqumAPNaQmqLFFf4c5mDpf9cPyvhrVaiSj03g96CqHBwMofdvavIICI4YVcoUJ-SBlqT6uSup7v4JusCGlUx1a8CzWZOqKHPWSGpZZDA-cr_yqX0bos/s200/ear-5.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj67k9gopQsc6dK3jdYF0dKGumWACxppmRDvfBIndW3cFVXbV6oceWHRef8D3bL6IR-z5Q2q8HAZihyphenhyphenYcfWpFCWsqZrzC31p5krBvi1NWleGUgTozhxw2j-0Ihrr_JKNZJiVPwSXGCXRXqk/s200/na6-1.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhfY7XDLjaEn1izJA0QndLJ-2KeSTb7vmdKRzzsk3D6Xu4qAYDryAPTkxvQZva2N6evYGQgSRvHhw5QUd_xBr6rEXFjiqLoHfpRIhHdVAq-80EsBRO3k8apFK6is1cQE2i94AZV20v0b-4i/s320/Parasite2.jpg)
I really like Deborah Aschheim's (is that German name?) neural network art (the blue one). I wish I were there to see it's spacial occupation.
ReplyDeleteSo many talents ...